it’s a preview for a documentary called Bush’s War on PBS.
to see other people in the tv audience reacting to the information and posting wikipedia links?
beyond just twittering about it – building a giant group reaction wall?
i understand that this could be done through IM but there is no big kahuna here
TV is such an input stream – it never ends.
METANOTES lets users converse about TV as it happens.
This would create interesting walls of dicussion content to which future readers could refer to when researching.
So The Idea I Have Is This:
http://tv.metanotes.com
Basically the atomic audience out there in TV-Land has about zero contact with each other during (or even after) the broadcast.
In other words, take notes and watch other people leave notes about a live event. Leave a little monument to your thoughts during the event. Interact with other notetakers. Watch things on your computer screen that complement the event.
So plug the TV stream into MetaNotes and voila! The ultimate complement to television – just what the networks have wanted to invent but failed to invent.
People watch a lot of TV.
TV is a “live event generator”.
But people don’t take NOTES on their watching of course.
I’ll have to research this – who’s the 800-pound gorilla in this?
as i went to change the note color I noticed the tags option… awesome!!
have you thought about specializing certain tags depending on what circle it’s in? for instance this TV discussion idea.
those are coming…
...also, i am intrigued by the idea of an onboard “calendar” so you could tag a note to “pop up” as a “reminder” in the future.
it’s amazing the walls of content you can create so fast
it makes writing a paper fun !!!
instead of threaded comments you can literally see the map of ideas being created
i’m totally addicted, it is hard to do anything else :)
social writing is amazing.
it’s sort of like when a conversation begins, a “tag” is generated with a “conversation ID”.
this “tag” can be followed backwards or forwards in time or along various users.
in a way the “tag” spawns a “space” where only the notes tagged with that particular conversation ID are displayed.
this would let you quickly see the whole conversation.
we can pull notes conforming to a specific tag to create a temporary overly “layer” that only holds that conversation.
we have this concept of certain tags being triggers to special conditions or behaviors.
like kudos.
or “favorites”.
or rating
this would add that note to your “starred” notespace, from which you could send it to one of your other spaces.
since the note’s tags would stay with it, you could navigate from that note up and down its own particular conversation chains.
say you just want the conversation that spawned from something 20 posts in, can you let someone isolate that chain?
it’d be super cool for notes to have a repulsion field so that new notes would spawn in such a way that they didn’t overlap.
bozos might spend all day covering up other people’s notes.
so we actually have thought about physics some !! :) but this is a good spark to think further about it.
conversations – especially ones that span spaces – need to be linked to one another somehow.
like inbox-to-inbox conversations are sort of a mess.
so that is some brain puzzling we still need to sort out :)
right now you can only really do this in the Notes menu (the one that’s right now a submenu of the “THE TV CIRCLE” menu, it’ll be better soon.)
so this is good.
where are you out of by the way? i’m in Hollywood CA !
that means the conversation ID tag should be rich.
you should be able to hover over a conversation ID and see the title of the next note of that conversation in the tooltip.
you would tag a given note “obama” if it related to obama…
...and then it would be linked to all other notes called obama.
can you zoom in and out? you may go off way to the side, and need to get to somewhere other than the top left
I’m not saying the physics need to be there yet, but just don’t let any individual reply get X distance away from parent. then things will be easier to shift around once a conversation is built.
(plus it would be cool to see them drag around!!)
that is a powerful thing, twitter bringing people into metanotes spaces
imagine if every note you created was posted out to twitter. now that would be crazy, and we won’t do that (although you’ll be able to send a single note to twitter in the future.
but that’s the “user activity stream” of a metanotes user.
and we can do some interesting things based on those streams, especially when we get friending going.
it would be cool to be able to link between notes almost like a wiki, except instead of plain HTML anchors you could be dropped into the middle of a space here
it’s fun to go back through the conversation and fill more ideas in.
also, future people can chime in adding value.
they are automatically tagged with a unique conversation ID.
this keeps them “together”, the same way a tag keeps items together.
here’s the semi-secret global note themes space
you’ve got some great ones going, feel free to create some in here
i am pretty certain beppu is coding user-level note themes at some point if he hasn’t already.
i would love user-level note themes to somehow relate to tagging as well.
it would be AWESOME to be able to define a type of thought that a note is (ephiphany, question, parenthetical thought etc)
you could define a default style for each..
a user-defined list of styles would be a generic way to do this, so they could use it however they want (thought types, different teams of a research group)
i think that is going to be a valuable notification framework indeed
you can go backwards and forwards in time along that conversation.
that could be done through a wizard.
to be honest I stuck around for a bit waiting to see if you’d come back but you didn’t.
the way I caught you this time was from twitter
it is a very unique chat app, you know, hard to describe !
They will like the idea of note-chatting about events as they happen.
in order to do that we need to plug input streams that spawn conversations into METANOTES.
Other input streams include:
we can do this through tagging…
say you just want to tie two thoughts together that aren’t very close spatially.. that shouldn’t have to limit the web of information!
that would be quite meta :)
this whole thing is all about threaded everything, hyperlinking across spaces, and documents that don’t grow like stacks but more like organic viral proliferations !!! !!! :)
and others will be able to add to it as well :)
Login | Create an Account |